Monday, September 7, 2009

This Is How the Muslims Helped the Zionists Occupy Palestine

One might find it hard to believe that the Muslims could possibly help the Zionist occupy Palestine. What- with all of the suffering that this occupation causes the Muslims throughout the world? How could the Muslims help the Zionists occupy not only Muslim land, but land where the third holiest place of worship in the Islamic world is located- Masjid Al-Aqsa? This seems quite hard to believe, but if we examine very closely and carefully what has happened, we’ll see that unfortunately it is the Muslims themselves who have made it very easy for the Zionists Jews to strip the Muslims of the land of Palestine.


Who are the Jews who have occupied Palestine? They are nothing more than European converts to Judaism who are in no way whatsoever related to the Hebrews and the Children of Israel. The Hebrews and the Children of Israel are, like the Arabs, descendants of Sam the son of Noah (Nuh). This is why the Hebrews are called the cousins of the Arabs. However, the European Jewish converts to Judaism are not the descendants of Sam the son of Noah. They are the Ashkenazi descendants of Japheth the son of Noah- the ancestor of the Europeans. The Ashkenazi Jews are the Jewish converts who are from Eastern Europe and Russia. They are the Zionist Jews who occupied Palestine. More than 90% of the Jews in the world today are Ashkenazi Jews. The Ashkenazis are the descendants of Gomer, the brother of Magog (more will be said about this Magog in another article inshaAllah), the sons of Japheth. As you can see, there is no Israel, Abraham, or Sam in their lineage.


There are certain physical characteristics that were given to European descendants of Japheth and other physical characteristics that were given to the Hebrew descendants of Sam. Of course the European descendants of Japheth are a light-skinned people with straight hair. I think we all agree on this point. To convince the world that they are the Hebrew descendants of Sam, the European descendants of Japheth had to attempt to make their appearance and the appearance of the Hebrews similar. For an example of how they are doing this, read the article at this link http://www.britam.org/anthropology.html. Read someone’s reply to the author’s ridiculous claim that the Hebrews were similar in appearance to the European Ashkenazi Jews who have occupied Palestine:


Reply to Challenge Concerning Israelites and Red Hair
Question:
Hi Yair,

You wrote:
David the King of Israel and forefather of the future Messiah was also described as "Admoni" which is exactly the same term, meaning "reddish" as that applied to Esau. "Admoni" can mean blonde or someone with red hair and freckled skin.

Actually Yair, this does not refer to fair skin or hair in any way, we are talking about Israelites, a Semitic and Mediteranean people, who would have been swarthy. Fair skin is an adaptation to a colder northern climate. This "Admoni" actually refers to a dark reddish brown, not fair skin.
These were Semitic people Yair. This word is related to Adam, and remember that Adam in the OT was created from the dust of the ground, and so this refers to the color of dirt, like I mentioned above a dark
reddish brown.
-M


What this respondent says here about the word adam meaning a dark complexion that is similar to the color of dirt is consistent with what the Arabs say that the Arabic word adam means. The respondent is explaining the Hebrew word admoni, which is the Hebrew equivalent of adam. In fact, the origin of the Hebrew word admoni is from the Arabic word adam. In Arabic adam means black-skinned and Arab tradition says that Adam, the father of mankind, was named Adam because of his dark complexion or because he was created from dirt and his color resembled the color of dirt.


For another example of European Ashkenazi Jews attempting to make their appearance and the appearance of the Hebrews similar, read the article at this link: http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/the-looks-of-ancient-jews/

Nicholas Wade of the New York Times wrote an article entitled Y Chromosome Bears Witness to Story of the Jewish Diaspora. In this article he says:

“With a new technique based on the male or Y chromosome, biologists have traced the diaspora of Jewish populations from the dispersals that began in 586 B.C. to the modern communities of Europe and the Middle East.”

“The analysis provides genetic witness that these communities have, to a remarkable extent, retained their biological identity separate from their host populations, evidence of relatively little intermarriage or conversion into Judaism over the centuries”.

http://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/09/science/y-chromosome-bears-witness-to-story-of-the-jewish-diaspora.html

So what this person wants to say is that the Ashkenazi European Jews are unmixed, pure-blooded Hebrews. He’s implying that the appearance of the European Jews is the same as the appearance of the Hebrew Children of Israel. But our Prophet Mohamed (SAWS), the seal of all prophets, put that thought to rest when he said:


“I saw Musa (Moses) and he was a jet black-skinned man.”

Masnad Imam Ahmed Hadith # 3365

وَرَأَيْتُ مُوسَى أَسْحَمَ آدَم


Our Prophet Mohamed (SAWS) saw our Prophet Musa/Moses (AS) and he found it necessary to describe his color to us. It’s as if he was informed that there would be illegitimate claimants to Hebrew lineage. He (SAWS) came from the Seven Heavens and described to us the color of Musa/Moses (AS) and he even described Musa/Moses’ hair texture. He said:


“As for Musa/Moses, he is a black-skinned man with kinky hair.”

Bukhari Hadith #243

َأَمَّا مُوسَى فَرَجُلٌ آدَمُ جَعْد


But in order to make the words of our Prophet Mohamed (SAWS) effective at all times and at all places, Muslims were given the responsibility to spread his words and not conceal them. This is where the Muslims are seriously negligent in their duty toward Allah and His Prophet (SAWS). Didn’t the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS) give the physical description of Musa/Moses (AS) for us to know? All Muslims are aware of the fact that we must take ALL of the words of the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS) seriously and that whatever he said, we must spread to the world. The Prophet Mohamed (SAWS) said that the Prophet Musa/Moses (AS) was black-skinned with kinky hair. He said this for us to spread to the world. If we had spread these words as we were supposed to, it would have been (and still would be) common knowledge that the Hebrews were and are a black-skinned people with kinky hair. However, unfortunately the Muslims have been uncharacteristically silent about this hadith of the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS) and as a result, the European Zionist Jews have been able to convince the world that they are the Hebrew descendants of the Children of Israel. As a result of being able to convince the world that they are the Children of Israel, the European Zionist Jews were able to take the land of Palestine from the Muslims. Do you see the result of not spreading the word of the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS)? Just one hadith of the Prophet Mohamed (SAWS) could have prevented the occupation of Palestine and the many wars and deaths that this occupation has resulted in. However, the Muslims chose to and still choose to be silent about this hadith. Are the Muslims ready to be the Helpers of Allah and throw truth at this falsehood?


بَلْ نَقْذِفُ بِالْحَقِّ عَلَى الْبَاطِلِ فَيَدْمَغُهُ فَإِذَا هُوَ زَاهِقٌ وَلَكُمُ الْوَيْلُ مِمَّا تَصِفُونَ


"Nay! We cast the truth against the falsehood, so that it breaks its head, and lo! it vanishes; and woe to you for what you describe" (Quran 21:18)

5 comments:

  1. http://www.hebrewisraelites.org/physicalapp.htm

    ReplyDelete
  2. It only makes sense that if the original Arabs were dark skinned then so too must have been the original Hebrews.


    For years, scholars, theologians and archaeologist have debated the answer to the question, "How did the ancient Israelites look physically? Although the scriptures and other historical documents, have left a lot of evidence that confirms the physical appearance of the Israelites. Much of this information is still unknown to the masses. The popular belief today among Christians, Scholars and theologians, is the people known as "Ashkenazi Jews" are the direct descendants of the ancient Israelites. But, can this be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt?

    The answer is NO.
    The history of the Israelite nation began in Egypt, the land of Ham. They entered Egypt 70 in number, (including Joseph, his wife and two sons who were already in Egypt), and left numbering over two million people. Ancient Israel spent 430 years in Egypt. For half that time they enjoyed good favor with the Egyptians, but for the remainder of those years they were enslaved and horribly mistreated by them.

    One of the facts scripture gives us about Israel (Ysrayl), is in regard to their physical appearance. Throughout scripture Israel is described as physically looking like the sons of Ham (Khawm), in appearance.

    Ham was one of Noah's three sons, Shem and Japheth were the other two. Noah's descendants repopulated the earth after the Great Flood. Ham's descendants are traced to the families of Africa. Ham (Khawm) in Hebrew means BLACK, HOT AND BURNT.
    Ham had four sons,

    1. CUSH (Ethiopians / Cushites & Nubians),
    2. MIZRAIM (Egyptians / Khemet),
    3. PHUT (Ancient Somalia),
    4. CANAAN (Canaanite, the original inhabitants of the land of Israel) genesis 10:6-19.

    All four of Ham's sons and their descendants settled in and around the continent of Africa, this includes the so called Middle East which is also a part of the Continent of Africa. Ham sons are the people of the African continent, the Ancient Egyptians, Ethiopians, Somalia's, Canaanites etc etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. As was mentioned, the ancient Egyptians were the descendants of Noah's son, Khawm, or Ham in English. Khawm means black, hot and burnt. The ancient Egyptians called their land and themselves Khemet, which in their tongue means "THE LAND OF BLACKS." The word Khemet is nothing but a variation on the word Khawm in the language of ancient Egypt.

    In Psalm 78:51, Egypt is called "The House of ham (Khawm)."

    "...AND SMOTE ALL THE FIRSTBORN IN EGYPT; THE TABERNACLES (HOUSE) OF HAM (KHAWM)."

    Psalm 105:23,27 -- 23 "ISRAEL ALSO CAME INTO EGYPT; AND SOJOURNED IN THE LAND OF HAM (KHAWM)."

    Verse 27 "THEY SHOWED HIS SIGNS AMONG THEM, AND WONDERS IN THE LAND OF HAM (KHAWM)."

    The scriptures calls Egypt the land of Khawm, and remember one of the meanings of Khawm is black, the scriptures is calling Egypt "The Land of Black" which is what Khemet means. Egypt is called the land of Khawm because the Egyptians were descendants of Noah's son Khawm.
    This is more than likely the reason they called themselves Khemet. Scripture supports the fact that the Egyptians were a black-skinned people.


    The Two Pictures above are Pharaoh Mentuhotep II (on the left) and his Daughter Princess Aushead. The Drawing of Aushead was taken from her fathers Tomb, the Statue of Pharaoh Mentuhotep II was also found in his tomb. Once again this is how the Egyptians of ancient times, physically looked.

    ReplyDelete
  4. For further proof of the color of the ancient Israelites lets look at Acts 13:1:

    "Now there were in the church that was at Antioch certain PROPHETS AND TEACHERS: as Barnabas, and SIMEON THAT WAS CALLED NIGER, AND LUCIUS OF CYRENE, and Manaen which had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Shaul (Paul)".

    The word Niger is a Latin word that means BLACK, and Cyrene is a city in Libya, which is located in North Africa. Historians and scholars both agree that the city of Cyrene was a black area, meaning it was heavily populated with black skin-people in "biblical" times. Cyrene is also the place where Simon, the man who helped Yahshuah carry the cross (stake) was from (Matt. 27:32, Mark 15:21, Luke 23:26). Many acknowledge that Simon (the cross bearer) was a "black" man.


    This man who was called Niger wasn't called black because he was the only black- skinned person there. He was called black because his hue was maybe darker than the rest of the prophets and teachers. Much like in the "African American" community, when one of our brothers or sisters have a skin tone that is darker than the rest, we sometimes give that person a nick name that describes his color. If the person's name is Michael we may refer to him as Black Mike, or we may call him Black, even though, we are all black-skinned. He's been given a FRIENDLY nick name which describes him. This is why Simeon was called Niger or black.

    Scripture confirms in Acts 13:1, that there were black-skinned men who were prophets and teachers at the church in Antioch. But, we must understand that the Hebrews were not dealing with any other people or racial group at this time, other than scattered Israel. It is written in Acts 11:19:

    "Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen, traveled As far as Phenice and Cyprus, and Antioch, PREACHING THE WORD TO NONE BUT THE HEBREWS ONLY".

    This was before the apostles ministries to the Gentiles at large started, so why were these "black" men there, if the Hebrews were a white people? Simple, they were Hebrews, just like Paul who was also there with them in the church in Antioch. Remember Paul was mistaken for a "black" Egyptian. Niger and LUCIUS were prophets and teachers, and as scripture shows us, all the prophets and teachers were Hebrews.

    Now, I will refer to a few historical sources that are also in agreement with scripture about the physical appearance of the Hebrews. The Romans who knew the Hebrews well, had this to say about their physical appearance.

    A Roman historian named Tacitus who lived about C.E. 90 said, "Many assert that the Hebrews are an RACE OF ETHIOPIAN ORIGINS."

    Once again, we have the Hebrews compared to one of HAM’S black-skinned descendants. Historian and scholar, J.A. Rogers commented, "For the Romans to have considered them Ethiopians is a clear indication of their color, because the Ethiopians are a known black people". Tacitus also said that the Hebrews were Egyptians , who left Egypt during a disease outbreak.

    You can read Tacitus full comments by going to the Cornelius Tacitus page, it can be found on the right side bar toward the bottom.

    The Roman Emperor, Justinian the Great, who ruled basically from 527 - 564 C.E., 500 years after the time of Yahshuah, had engraved on a coin, the image of Yahshuah with woolly / kinky hair and "BLACK" features. On the obverse side of the coin there is an image of Justinian but with straight hair.

    The Cambridge Encyclopedia has this particular listing about that image on the coin.

    "Whatever the fact, this coin, with the straight haired Justinian on the obverse side, places beyond doubt the belief that "Jesus" was a Negro (black-skinned)."

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete